Women of the right age are typically attractive. Most guys rate women of the right age too high IMO. I chose this photo because it is all women near the peak attractive age (these would all be between 19 and 22), all healthy, all dressed similar, and are close to a genetical cross section of women in our church, not movie stars or some other anomaly. These girls would be more ambitious than the average church goer, as she is the type to on a mission for 18 months and that might reflect on their weight.
The looks scale is based on the normal distribution curve as shown:
Methodology
Since the normal curve goes on to infinity, I need to chop off the ends. For the sake of argument, I will say that a ten is a "one in a thousand". Following the curve out, the best looking in the world (1/3.5 billion, Z score of 6.2988, which gives a looks scale of 14.57) but 9s and 10s are so similar, I will just call the best as 10s and that is where I am chopping it off. I tried defining the 10 as a "one in a million", but it lumped all of these girls as 4 to 6, which is not very useful, the variance needs to be visible for most girls we run into. If there are 1/1000 that are a 10, in the world, there are approximately 3.5 million tens (at least they are in the peak of their lives).
First, I need to number the girls so I can know who I am talking about.
Now, I will order the young women from prettiest to ugliest. (the order will vary slightly from person to person) F2, G5, F6, A1, E8, C3, E6, F4, B9, E1, E5, B2, H1, D8, E9. D3, B3, H2, A2, E7, B1, F5, D1, G3, D4, B4, H6, G1, D5, C4, E2, D9, B7, H5, C7, D2, H3, F7, C1, C9, B8, H4, B10, C6, G4, G2, C2, E3, D7, E4, G7, H7, G6, C8, F3, B5, C5, F1, D6, B6 There are 53 girls referenced in this photo. Using math and the normal distribution curve, and defining the "one in a thousand" as a 10, I can figure out the distribution of these. Score Percentile Z Girl 0 0.05 -3.2905 1 0.42 -2.6324 2 2.41 -1.9743 B6 3 9.40 -1.3162 F3 4 25.5 -0.6581 C2 5 50 0 B4 6 74.5 0.6581 H1 7 90.6 1.3162 C3 8 97.59 1.9743 F2 9 99.38 2.6324 10 99.95 3.2905 Results Look at the photo and pick out the girl I referenced in the chart. The hottest girl in this photo (F2) is an 8, the ugliest (B6) is a 2. Considering these are all young women who have taken care of themselves, and not whored around or got into drugs or tattoos, this should be the standard of beauty. You look at an average 5 (B4) and she is very attractive. Most high value guys would be willing to commit themselves to a woman like her. In essence, all an average woman has to do to be very attractive and find a high value guy to marry and live happily ever after is remain clean, and be open to marry at the right time in her life. That is it.
She is a 2
She is a 3
She is a 4
She is a 5
She is a 6
She is a 7
She is an 8
If I had a collection of 1000 women in similar circumstances, I could have picked out a 10 if we are judging only by their picture. They are very rare, Christie Brinkley in her prime may be considered a 10. A 9 would be an absolute stunner, Margot Robbie in her prime is a good example. While the normal distribution goes on forever, by the time you talk to them, you will notice flaws in all of them. So that's why on a scale from 0-10, there ain't no 10's.
Conversely, there are women on the bottom end of the spectrum. 1's are the obese, and while there are a large number of them, this is not their natural prime state. They made poor choices in life which they must suffer the consequences. 0's are on a different level, they are the medical cases which invoke nothing but pity. However, women in that situation typically have things going for them, like a humble attitude which brings their number up. There ain't no 0's either.